How much does a security audit cost in Thailand?

The cost of a security audit in Thailand depends on the size and complexity of your systems. A focused assessment of a single web app starts in the low thousands of US dollars, while a full audit across multiple applications and infrastructure is a larger engagement. We scope a fixed, transparent quote after a short discovery call — book a free assessment and we will give you a clear number.

What does a penetration test in Bangkok include?

Our penetration testing in Bangkok covers the OWASP Top 10, authentication and access controls, API and business-logic flaws, infrastructure misconfigurations, and exposed secrets. You receive a prioritised report with proof-of-concept findings and clear, actionable remediation steps — not just an automated scan.

Do you help with PDPA compliance in Thailand?

Yes. Alongside the technical security audit we review your systems against Thailand's PDPA (Personal Data Protection Act) — how personal data is stored, encrypted, accessed and logged — and flag the gaps you need to close for compliance, with practical fixes.

How long does a security audit take?

A typical security audit takes one to three weeks depending on scope. We agree the timeline up front, work in clear phases, and deliver the full prioritised report at the end so your team can start fixing the highest-risk issues immediately.

Ongoing security

TrueShield Security Audit

We measure your site from the outside every month, explain what we find in plain language, and tell you what to do about it. No guarantee against intrusion — nobody can give you one. But you stop guessing.

See levels and prices Get in touch

0days

is the average time to find a breach

The lowest figure in nine years, and still eight months. The longer something runs unnoticed, the more it costs to sort out. A breach costs in the order of USD 4.44 million globally, a number that actually fell 9% last year.

IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, 2025

0requests

were blocked against our own site in 20 days

Measured in our Cloudflare log in July and August 2026. This is not an attack on us in particular. It is the background noise every site on the internet stands in, around the clock.

Our own measurement, 2026-07-12 to 2026-08-08

You know where the site stands, every month

You get a grade, a list of what needs fixing, and the evidence behind each point. Not a technical report you have to interpret, but an answer you can act on. A check we could not complete is reported as unresolved, never as approved. And no report reaches you before a person has read it.

The 28 checks

Everything measured, every time. No selection, no surprises.

Domain and infrastructure

That the domain's basics are correct and cannot be forged

Open ports

That nothing unnecessary is open to the internet

HTTPS and redirects

That visitors always land on the encrypted version

SSL/TLS certificate

That the connection is encrypted and the certificate is valid

Certificate on your server

That the certificate behind the shield has not expired

Security headers

That the browser gets instructions blocking common attacks

Cross-site sharing

That other sites cannot read your data

Cookies and sessions

That logins cannot be stolen by a script

Technology and CMS

Which platform you run and its known weak points

The report is the product

Two layers in one document: one for the people deciding, one for the people fixing. Every finding has a line stating the evidence, so you can check us.

One layer for the people deciding
One for the people fixing
An evidence line under every finding
The same format every month

You get a grade, not a list

A to F on a scale where urgent findings weigh heaviest. The same scale every month, so a change means something.

The scale is the same every month and counted the same way every time, so a change between two reports means something real and not that we moved the yardstick.

90–100

80–89

70–79

60–69

50–59

0–49

In your report, your own grade is marked like this.

Choose how close we stand

Insyn sees from outside. Skydd stands in front. Vakt sees inside.

Insyn

We see the site from outside

€0/mo

Monthly scan of the site
Uptime with history
Automatic report, unread by a person
Free if we host you

Most chosen

Skydd

We stand in front of the site

€390/mo

Everything in Insyn
Cloudflare Pro, paid by us
Traffic monitoring at the wall
Report reviewed by a person
Alarm when a backup job goes quiet
2 hours of remediation time per month

Vakt

We see inside the server

€690/mo

Everything in Skydd
Agent on the server
Code integrity watched
Alarms on the host condition
4 hours of remediation time per month

The line between Insyn and Skydd is human judgement

Insyn tells you what was found. Skydd tells you what to do about it. That is the whole difference, and the only reason to upgrade.

More coverage, never a stronger guarantee. Each level sees more of the picture, but none is a guarantee against intrusion.

WordPress is a risk, and it is manageable

WordPress powers 41.2% of all websites (W3Techs, August 2026). That makes it the most attacked, not the worst. In 2025, 11,334 new vulnerabilities were found in the ecosystem, a 42% increase. 91% of them were in plugins. The core had a handful.

And 39.1% of the sites that were actually infected were running outdated software at the time. The risk sits in the plugins, and plugins are handled by someone keeping them updated. That is what the remediation time in Skydd and Vakt buys. We run five WordPress sites ourselves.

W3Techs (2026-08) · Patchstack, State of WordPress Security (2025) · Sucuri, Hacked Website Report (2023)

How to start

Insyn costs nothing if we host you. You get the first report in the next monthly run and can read it before deciding on anything more.

See prices and levels Get in touch